Question: Megan fox or rachel weisz as catwoman in the sequel to "the dark knight?"?

(Posted by: Max on 2009-10-02 11:32:19)

I think rachel weisz, cuz megan fox still cant act. and be aware, catwoman is completely covered up so dont say megan fox cuz you think shes hot!

Posted by: Shane-o-Mac on 2009-10-02, 11:37:46

Neither. I don't want Catwoman. Or Penguin. Or the Riddler. Or any other character that's been done. Batman has a huge rogues gallery, let's see somebody like Black Mask or the Mad Hatter!

Posted by: dd on 2009-10-02, 11:36:31

Well megan fox is pretty and she looks good on screen but every movie shes made sucks all u basicaly do in the whole movie is look at her

Posted by: swingswingx3 on 2009-10-02, 11:38:47

DEFINITELY rachel weisz. she's prettier and deserves a good role like that. megan wouldn't be able to pull it off and i'd be extremely disappointed if someone cast her in a role where she actually needed to act and not sit there and look hot.